Questions Every LP Asks and What Smart VCs Should Say

alk into an LP meeting and you’ll feel it immediately. The questions come fast, sharp, and unrelenting, and even seasoned GPs with strong track records get pressed the way top VCs press founders. It is not hostility; it’s simply diligence. LPs want to know whether you and your fund are built to last.

They are not looking for trick answers, they are looking for signs of readiness, repeatability, and durability. Can you explain your edge without hiding behind jargon? Can you show how your strategy works across cycles, not just in a bull market? Can you prove that the way you invest today can scale into Fund II, Fund III, and beyond?

What follows is a rare inside look at the questions LPs really ask. More importantly, it is a guide to what those questions are meant to uncover, and how smart VCs should answer them.

‍

Why LP Questions Matter

Sit in an LP’s chair for a moment. You are not evaluating a single pitch deck, you are underwriting a relationship that might last a decade or more. Every question you ask, no matter how tactical it sounds, rolls up into three big tests.

The first is durability. Can this fund survive cycles, down markets, and multiple vintages? LPs have seen too many managers ride one hot trend, only to vanish when conditions shift. They want to know you can endure.

The second is repeatability. Is there a system behind how you source, support, and perform? LPs are allergic to one-off wins. They are listening for a clear process that can be run again and again, not a collection of lucky breaks.

The third is alignment. Are the incentives structured so LPs and GPs win together? Management fees, GP commit, and carry terms all send signals. If the balance tilts toward GP enrichment, LPs will notice.

Strip away the surface-level diligence and almost everything an LP asks feeds into one of these buckets. What they want to know is simple: can you build a firm that is durable, repeatable, and aligned with their capital?

‍

The 5 Core Pillars of LP Diligence

Every LP conversation eventually circles back to a handful of themes. The surface questions vary, but the crux of diligence is consistent. They want to know how you find opportunities, why founders choose you, how you protect ownership, what your numbers say, and whether your firm is built to last. These are the five pillars that shape almost every line of inquiry.

1) Dealflow and Sourcing Engine

What LPs ask:

• Where do your deals come from?
• How much is inbound versus outbound?
• How do you get allocations when rounds get hot?

Why they ask:

An LP knows your first ten deals are easy; friends, recycled networks, warm intros. The test is whether your pipeline still runs at year three, when the honeymoon is over. They are asking if you’ve built a sourcing machine or if you’re dependent on being in the right place at the right time.

What strong answers look like:

- A funnel that’s measurable; “We reviewed 600 companies last year, ran diligence on 80, invested in 12.”

- A system that compounds; “A scout program that sources 30 percent of deals, founder clinics that generate repeat introductions, targeted content that brings founders inbound.”

- Proof you can win allocation; “Three of our last five investments were competitive rounds, and founders chose us because we moved faster and committed first.”

An insider gem:

One LP told me they can tell within five minutes if a GP is bluffing. “If the funnel feels too smooth, too round a number, it usually is.” The sharp GPs share real artifacts - CRM screenshots, funnel metrics, or even a calendar of sourcing activities. That’s how you prove sourcing isn’t smoke.

‍

2) Differentiation and Edge

What LPs ask:

• What’s your edge?
• Why should a founder pick you over the next ten funds?

Why they ask:

To an LP, every fund starts to blur. “We back great founders in big markets” sounds the same after the first dozen pitches. They are trying to find out whether you have a mechanism that gives you repeatable edge, not a thesis you copy-pasted from TechCrunch.

What strong answers look like:

- The “X-Y-Z” test; “Because X, I get deals. Because Y, I help founders. Because Z, I return capital.”

- Specifics that pass the memo test; “Because I ran product at A and B, I get the first calls from founders in data infra. Because I host a PM forum, I help them shape GTM. Because I own pro-rata and reserves, I can double down on the winners.”

An insider gem:

LPs have a phrase: “Show me your edge, don’t tell me your edge.” The best GPs don’t just claim differentiation, they demonstrate it with examples of founders coming back to them first, or competitors losing deals to them. One LP even said they take note of how GPs explain a miss. If your “edge” didn’t help you win a deal, maybe it isn’t edge at all.

‍

3) Founder Support and Ownership Durability

What LPs ask:

• What do you actually do for founders?
• How do you make sure your ownership doesn’t evaporate by Series B?

Why they ask:

Ownership drives DPI, not paper marks. LPs know reserves and pro-rata rights are meaningless if founders don’t trust you enough to invite you back in. This question tests whether you’re a check-writing tourist or a partner who makes a founder’s life easier.

What strong answers look like:

- A 100-day playbook; “We run talent briefs in week one, connect to design partners by week three, set up pricing experiments by week six.”

- Evidence of impact; “Seventy percent of our portfolio has made their first two senior hires through our network. Two founders specifically credited our board starter kit for preparing them for Series A.”

- Ownership durability as a KPI; “We track percentage of initial stake retained through Series A; current average is 72 percent.”

An insider gem:

One LP shared how a GP’s founder references killed the deal. The GP had glowing IRR but founders said, “We never heard from them again after the first check.” LPs will always trade glossy support decks for authentic references. They call them “the truth serum” of diligence.

‍

4) Track Record, Performance and Risk

What LPs ask:

• Show me your returns, gross and net.
• How do you mark companies?
• What went wrong, and what changed after failures?

Why they ask:

LPs aren’t blinded by IRR slides. They’re trained to see through inflated marks, subscription-line magic, and cherry-picked wins. They want to know whether you understand risk, whether you’ve learned from losses, and whether your reporting aligns with industry standards.

What strong answers look like:

- Transparent reporting; “Here’s our TVPI and DPI, gross and net, with and without sub-line impact.”

- A mark policy tied to recognized guidelines, reviewed by admin and auditor.

- Honest post-mortems; “We lost money on Company X. Here’s the memo we wrote after, and here’s how that failure shaped our sourcing rules today.”

An insider gem:

One LP joked: “If a GP says they’ve never had a zero, they’re either lying or they haven’t invested enough.” The strongest managers don’t dodge their losses; they own them and show how the lessons hardened their process. That candor often builds more trust than an extra basis point of IRR.

‍

5) Firm Durability, Terms and Alignment

What LPs ask:

• Why this fund size?
• How much of your own money is in the fund?
• What happens if a key partner leaves?
• How do you handle sub-lines, NAV loans, continuation funds?

Why they ask:

LPs know firms don’t collapse from bad logos, they collapse from bad structures. Misaligned fees, over-leverage, and partner splits kill more funds than bad deals. They’re probing whether your house is in order and whether your incentives are tied to their returns, not to your lifestyle.

What strong answers look like:

- Strategy tied to math; “A $75M fund lets us do 25 deals at $3M average, target 10 percent ownership, and hold reserves. That’s the only size that makes sense.”

- GP commit in real cash, not fee recycling; “Our team’s capital is in cash, not fee recycling. It’s structured to show conviction without creating liquidity strain.”

- Governance scaffolding: clear key person plan, LPAC, succession rules; “We’ve formalized a key person plan, aligned team economics, and built an LPAC structure to ensure continuity if someone steps away.”

- Credit policy spelled out; “We cap sub-line usage at 10 percent, average 45 days, and always disclose IRR with and without.”

An insider gem:

LPs quietly benchmark GP commits. If they sense the number is mostly fee-financed, they’ll discount it. They also watch how you talk about continuation funds. The best GPs treat them as a tool for alignment, not as a liquidity shortcut.

‍

The Cross-Cutting Themes LPs Probe

Not every LP question fits neatly into a funnel metric or a performance table. Some of the toughest calls come down to intangibles. These are the quiet factors that rarely show up on a deck but often decide whether the answer is yes or no.

Liquidity readiness

LPs have learned the hard way that paper gains don’t pay pensions. They want to know how you think about turning TVPI into DPI. Do you understand secondaries, continuation funds, and the pacing of distributions? A GP who only talks about “big logos” but avoids the question of realizations usually signals risk. Smart managers get ahead of this by showing a framework for returning capital, not just growing marks.

Succession and team stability

An LP doesn’t just back your fund, they back your firm. They ask about succession not because they expect you to leave tomorrow, but because they’ve seen teams fracture and value evaporate overnight. The subtext here is continuity; if your firm depends on one person, it’s a risk. Strong answers outline key person coverage, team economics, and evidence that juniors are on a real track to partnership.

Transparency and bad-news reflex

Every fund stumbles, but what LPs test is whether you will call them before they hear about it elsewhere. They watch your body language when you talk about failures. Are you defensive, or do you treat bad news as part of the business? The best GPs develop a reflex: quick, candid updates with context and a plan. LPs remember that long after they’ve forgotten your last IRR chart.

Fit and alignment with LP mandate

Finally, LPs ask questions that seem random - “What’s your view on ESG reporting?” or “How does your strategy fit into our global portfolio?” These aren’t throwaways, they’re checking whether your fund aligns with their own obligations. A U.S. university endowment, a European pension, and a Middle Eastern sovereign wealth fund all have different mandates. Smart GPs tailor their answers to show they’ve done homework on the LP’s strategy, not just their own.

‍

The “Gotcha” Questions of 2025

Some LP questions don’t show up in the first meeting, but they surface in diligence and can make or break trust, so below are the technical checks where one sloppy answer raises red flags.

IRR with or without sub-lines

• LPs want both numbers.
• If you only show the boosted version, they assume you’re hiding something.

NAV loan policy

• What’s the cap? Who approves?
• Strong answer: “LPAC oversight, hard limits on size and tenor, full reporting each quarter.”

Insider rounds

• Did you re-up in a flat or down round?
• LPs test whether you protect founders or paper over marks. Honesty matters more than spin.

SEC marketing rule compliance

• Can you back up every number in your deck?
• LPs have seen managers tripped up by sloppy footnotes, so audited data wins here.

ILPA v2.0 templates

• Are you reporting in the standard format?
• Saying yes signals you’re institution-ready; saying no suggests you’re not.

How to handle them

When faced with these technical questions, don't dodge, answer cleanly, with specifics. Keep policies written, not improvised, and offer data, oversight, and examples of past practice to demonstrate you've thought through these issues systematically rather than reactively. These are litmus tests, not trick questions. Get them right and LPs see professionalism. Get them wrong and they start wondering what else you’re glossing over.

‍

How to Win LP Conversations

LPs don’t commit because you dazzled them with vision. They commit because you showed clarity, evidence, and discipline. The strongest managers walk into every meeting with a framework that makes it easy for LPs to say yes.

Anchor in Clarity

Every LP wants to see the numbers behind your story. That’s why the one-pager matters so much. The best managers keep it crisp - strategy, fund size math, pacing assumptions - laid out in a way that an LP could drop straight into their IC memo. If your narrative isn’t crystal clear on a single page, it won’t survive the committee filter.

Lead with Evidence

Anecdotes don’t close commitments, data does. Smart GPs bring dashboards, audited statements, and side-by-side gross versus net numbers. If you’re using facilities or NAV loans, you earn trust by reporting results both with and without impact. The more verifiable and transparent your numbers are, the faster LPs relax into the idea that you run with discipline.

Show Earned Confidence

Humility lands better than spin. LPs trust a GP who can say, “We got this wrong, and here’s how we fixed it.” Owning the lessons shows maturity and process, not fragility. It demonstrates that your confidence is earned through mistakes absorbed and systems improved, not blind optimism.

Prove You’re Building a Firm, Not Just a Fund

The conversation shouldn’t end with this vintage. LPs back managers who are building institutions. That means succession planning, team growth, governance scaffolding, and a clear sense of how Fund I evolves into Fund II and beyond. Show that this fund is part of a longer arc, not a one-off project.

Put It All Together

Before every LP meeting, run a simple pre-flight check: is your one-pager clear, are your data packs audit-ready, do you have one story of a mistake that made you stronger, and can you show the firm you’re building? These are the table stakes that separate GPs who talk about durability from those who actually embody it.

‍

LP Questions Are a Mirror, Not a Test

LP diligence isn’t a hurdle to clear, it’s the mirror that shows you the firm you’re really building. Every question about sourcing, reserves, or governance is a chance to sharpen your systems and prove that your process is durable, repeatable, and aligned with the people trusting you with their capital.

The best-prepared GPs treat LP conversations as partnership-building, not interrogation. They walk away stronger, with sharper narratives and cleaner processes. That preparation doesn’t just make you more fundable. It makes you a better investor, a better partner to founders, and the kind of firm LPs want to back across multiple vintages.