VC is competitive.
People joke that you have a better shot at pro baseball than venture. The math is not the point. The posture is. You cannot talk your way into VC. You practice your way in.
VC also looks bigger than it is. By the end of 2023, the US ecosystem had 3,417 VC firms. Those firms did 13,608 deals worth $170.6B, managed about $1.21T in assets, and held $311.6B in dry powder. A lot of capital, run by relatively few humans.
Then it got tighter.
PitchBook data, reported by the Financial Times, shows the number of active VC investors in US headquartered companies fell from 8,315 in 2021 to 6,175 in 2024. In 2024, more than half of the $71B raised by US VCs went to just nine firms. Seats narrowed. Standards rose.
So what wins an interview in 2026?
Not “I’m impressive.” Everyone looks impressive on paper. The candidates who get offers show something rarer. They make it obvious how they fit the firm’s operating logic.
The shift: from credentials to being the missing piece
A strong background can get you in the room. But in 2026, offers go to people who can answer this quickly:
What can you do for our strategy that we cannot do as well without you?
That is a different kind of interview prep. It is less about polishing your story and more about proving your uniqueness and value.
Examples of value that actually land:
You can source in an emerging hub the team does not cover.
You can run a technical deep dive on AI infrastructure without hand waving.
You can write an investment memo that reads like a partner wrote it.
You can bring pattern recognition in a niche the firm keeps circling but never quite nails.
One of our alumni, Sharran Deora, put it simply after his process: a strong background got him the interview. Matching the firm’s internal priorities got him the offer.
The prep framework: five question types you will keep seeing
Most VC interviews orbit the same targets. You can practice them like drills.
- Who are you, and why do you fit this team?
- What can you do that the role needs, with proof?
- Where have you succeeded or struggled, and what changed because of it?
- Why VC, why this firm, why now?
- How will you source, judge, win, and support deals?
If you prep answers for those five, you stop improvising.
Your answers need structure, but they must not sound like a template
Use structure to stay tight. Use rhythm to sound human.For behavioral questions, STAR is fine. Add one more beat so you show judgment growth.
STAR LP
Situation: one sentence of context
Task: what you owned
Action: what you did, in verbs
Result: what changed, ideally with numbers
Learning and Planning: what you changed after, and how you apply it now
That last step matters in venture. VC is a job about decisions under imperfect information. People hire your judgment.
A simple upgrade: include one decision you made under uncertainty. Name the tradeoff you chose. Explain why.
The easiest way to be senior: put numbers in your stories
VC is an evidence business. Without numbers, your story floats away.
Numbers that count:
Revenue, margin, retention, conversion
Pipeline volume and win rate
Cycle time reductions
Growth rates, not just totals
Constraints you worked under like time, budget, headcount
Your job is to answer one question: what changed because you were there?
Compensation is part of the interview, not an awkward epilogue
Some candidates treat compensation like a separate conversation that happens after they “win.”
But Comp is a continuation of fit. If you cannot talk about it clearly, you signal you do not understand the market, the role, or your value.
The fix is boring and powerful. Use real market data.
Venture5’s 2025 VC Salary Survey compiles compensation benchmarks across roles and firm types, based on hundreds of responses. It gives you a starting point that is not vibes.
Use it to stay grounded:
Anchor to the role, level, and geography
Separate base, bonus, and carry
Ask clean questions about structure and timeline
Negotiation is not a flex. It is a competence test.
Use AI like a simulator, not a ghostwriter
AI will not replace your thinking. It will expose gaps in your thinking.
Build your Who and Why
Paste your resume and the job description. Ask for:
A 90 second “tell me about yourself”
A 20 second version for cold intros
A list of claims you make that lack evidence, plus what proof would fix them
Then rewrite it in your own voice. Out loud.
Drill like a practice partner
Ask the model to interview you like a skeptical partner for 15 minutes.
After each answer, get a score on:
Clarity
Ownership
Judgment
Adversarial rehearsal
This is underrated. Ask:
Argue why my thesis is wrong
What would make this market not venture scale
What would a partner with the opposite belief say
Then rebuild your argument. That is literally the job.
Two exercises that turn you into a hireable candidate
1 The 2 Page Thesis Test
Pick one niche. Write a two page investment thesis.
If it flows, you found alignment.
If it feels forced, you found the gap you need to close.
2 The Firm Need Audit and Pitch
List 10 to 15 target firms.
Scan team bios, portfolio, and recent writing.
Name one pattern or gap you can fill.
Write a six sentence pitch that connects your proof to their priorities.
Test it on someone who will be honest. Tighten it until it feels inevitable.
The reality check that should motivate you
Capital stays abundant. Seats stay scarce. The market keeps concentrating.
That is not a reason to spiral. It is a reason to practice with intent
You do not need to sound perfect. You need to sound specific. You need to sound useful.
Interested in the full research paper?
Join to receive Venture Capital research, guides, models, career tips, and many other great insights delivered straight to your inbox.
